All Things Assyrian
Gilgamesh As A Metaphor
Bookmark and Share

This tale is about the limits of ambition; it is about power, about piety, and about man's inhumanity to man and life's timeless lessons to man. Our tale is also about the beauty of friendship and the greatness of human curiosity and valour. Gilgamesh, the hero of this ancient epic, is part God and part man. He is the pious king of the city-state of Uruk. He is a great builder and a dreamer. Of great but at first unguided power, and with a burning vision, Gilgamesh is humanized by his friend, Enkidu, and after his friend's death, he searches for answers to life's mysteries which always elude him.

At first, Gilgamesh is a notorious despot. His oppressed subjects pray for relief, which the gods give to them in Enkidu- a natural, innocent demi-god, who lives and runs with wild animals. Hearing of this danger, Gilgamesh, by a clever ruse, deprives Enkidu of his natural animal power. But Enkidu is till a threat and attacks Gilgamesh to regain his stolen power. Though Gilgamesh wins the fight, the two demi-gods learn quickly to respect each other's valour.

Under the influence of Enkidu's moral strength and advice, Gilgamesh becomes just and wise. In other words, the epic seems to say that through humanity and friendship comes justice. But there is also greatness and Gilgamesh wants it. His ambition is to break through into an unknown territory, and with Enkidu, he embarks on an adventure into "The land of Cedars," (i.e the forests of Lebanon).

Fame is his desire: Shamash, The Sun-God, is his guide. After conquering the protector of the forests- the giant Humbaba, Gilgamesh strips the forests of trees, presumably to build Uruk into a great city. In short, ambition and piety combine to produce greatness. At the end of all greatness, however, there is death. Because Gilgamesh and Enkidu kill a sacred bull belonging to the goddess Ishtar, the gods decree that Enkidu must die. Enkidu is quickly stricken with illness; he languishes and dies. In mourning and despair, Gilgamesh concludes that "The end of life is sorrow." Then comes human fragility, frustration and grief. Lamenting his friend's death, Gilagmesh determines to seek the immortal Utu-Napishtim, who lives in Dilmun, the garden of the sun, and to ask him for the secret of eternal life. Though Gilgamesh is told that he will never find this life, he is resolute: "Let my eyes see the sun," he says, "until they are dazzled with looking. Although I am no better than a dead man, still, let me see the light of the sun." After discouragement and difficulty, Gilgamesh reaches Utu-Napishtim (The ancient Assyrian equivalent of the Biblical Noah) whose narrative is lengthy. Generations earlier, Utu-Napishtim had been chosen by the God --of -- the --Sweet-Waters, Ea, to preserve all species. Seven seems to be Utu-Napishtim's magic number: seven days of building the boat; six days of storm and a seventh of calm; seven days aground on Mount Nisir before learning that the flood has receded. As reward, the Earth --and-Air God En Lil, gave Utu-Napishtim eternal life. It is to obtain this secret that Gilgamesh has traveled to Dilmun.

As the epic constantly shows, however, all human dreams come to nothing. Gilgamesh gains the secret of eternal life- an underwater plant- but it is stolen from him by a serpent. There is nothing left but death for our king. Returning to Uruk, he quickly succumbs to the inevitable and almost automatic death which, try as he might to avoid it was always his destiny. But our one and only Gilgamesh is, indeed, very hard to understand. He is seen mainly through the eyes of fifth columnists who impart value judgment to much of his story. He also is the subject of much interpretation and misinterpretation by many people, so that we hear many views of him. In addition, our man is the principal figure in a richly symbolic tragicomedy, so that much of what he says and does is relevant or irrelevant to most people at most times. In this respect, his individuality is sacrificed to his existence as a symbol- symbol of good and bad. Despite all these difficulties, however, Gilgamesh emerges as a fully developed individual. To me, the key to the understanding of his character is that he is a man capable of imagining the best in himself and in men generally -- a man whose action at any given moment is controlled by an idea of the best. Our man is, in the word of literary experts, a "romantic" and I would add here, that he is an introspective dreamer.

I believe that his character is made clear by three incidents in his life all of which are connected with power and its aftermath. His ability to keep his subjects guessing about his state of mind is symbolic of his preference for physical over mental heroism. And his subjects' constant cry for him to speak out on his supposed ambition hurts his own high evaluation of himself. Rather, his latest joker is that the people must adopt a new economic slogan: 20-2020. Whatever that means, only God can ascertain who can live up to the year 2020. Yet, imbued with the African ideals of manhood and adventure, he had been dreaming of his own opportunity to save his fatherland from economic quagmire and martial uneasiness. But when the opportunity comes to lead in a rescue operation, he appears to miss the boat. He does not hump. From this point, Gilgamesh becomes a drifter, for his ambition has given his subjects a hint of the basic indecision (cowardice would be too strong a word at this point) which is worrying the bubble of his own self-esteem. This major incident brings out the depths of his being, that inner panic which destroys all his conscious dreams for his nation by causing a single cowardly act despite his good intentions. Didn't psychologists say that only men whose cupboards are full of skeletons cling to power permanently to cheat justice?

With Gilgamesh's depths thus exposed, we believe he feels, morally naked, without the privacy that most of us have, unless he confesses to his subjects as to who succeeds him. His conscious dream of what is right has enabled him to face the consequences of his real guilt, which is being part of the group that conspired against Enkidu and stole his landslide victory fuming that Enkidu was not the messiah Uruk needed. Perhaps this facing of the moral trial alone when all his cohorts flee is the start of Gilgamesh's awareness, acted upon but never clearly stated by him, that life constantly demands expiation for guilt that is caused not entirely by our own choice. As we all know, our man is convinced of the value of his dream, and always behaves to type. These are the conscious virtues, to which Gilgamesh adheres closely, since they are the embodiment of his character as a dreamer and of ambition. Yet, admittedly, King Gilgamesh is a puzzling character, since his characteristics show that human life is a mystery and since we never really get inside him. But God has used him to demonstrate that, if life has its depths, it also has its high points. At the highest points, a human being willing to live out his dream, if this dream has value and ennobles mankind, can justify that life is elevated and great. Gilgamesh, with all his frailty, is a truly great representation of a ruler, since he has met and conquered life's greatest obstacle-the climax of ambition. Yet our epic concludes on the ideas that life is brief and filled with sorrow, that the desire for power does not satisfy, and that the quest for eternal life here on earth cannot succeed. Therefore man's noblest achievement is justice, moderation and kindness to others during life.

By Dan Amor
www.independentng.com



Type your comment and click
or register to post a comment.
* required field
User ID*
enter user ID or e-mail to recover login credentials
Password*